<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Super Awesome Blog &#187; Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superawesomeblog.com/tag/bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superawesomeblog.com</link>
	<description>Roleplaying, GURPS, News, Reviews, and lots of AWESOME.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Oath Re-Do Bible-less?</title>
		<link>http://www.superawesomeblog.com/2009/01/23/obamas-oath-re-do-bible-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.superawesomeblog.com/2009/01/23/obamas-oath-re-do-bible-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SAB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oath of Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superawesomeblog.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Olberman reported today that (responding to Glenn Beck&#8217;s reporting) that Barack Obama&#8217;s redo oath of office did not include a copy of the bible.  Looks like they got a few things right this time around.  Doesn&#8217;t it seem more appropriate to have an incoming president swear on the Constitution he&#8217;s swearing to protect than on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-204 alignright" title="no-bible-needed-copy" src="http://www.superawesomeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/no-bible-needed-copy.png" alt="no-bible-needed-copy" width="152" height="144" /><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/">Keith Olberman</a> reported today that (responding to Glenn Beck&#8217;s reporting) that Barack Obama&#8217;s redo oath of office <span style="text-decoration: underline;">did not</span> include a copy of the bible.  Looks like they got a few things right this time around.  Doesn&#8217;t it seem more appropriate to have an incoming president swear on the Constitution he&#8217;s swearing to protect than on a work of fiction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.superawesomeblog.com/2009/01/23/obamas-oath-re-do-bible-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
